All Articles |
Articles By Author |
Articles By Magazine |
Articles By Subject |
Full Text Search |
Aubane Historical Society |
The Heresiarch Website |
Athol Books Online Sales |
Athol Books Home Page |
Archive Of Articles From Church & State |
Archive Of Editorials From Church & State |
Archive Of Articles From Irish Political Review |
Archive Of Editorials From Irish Political Review |
Belfast Historical & Educational Society |
Athol Books Secure Online Sales |
Irish Writer Desmond Fennell |
The Bevin Society |
David Morrison's Website |
From: Irish Foreign Affairs: Editorials |
Date: July, 2009 |
By: Editorial |
The end of an Irish Foreign Policy? |
An Bord Snip [Irish Government’s Expenditure Review Committee] recommended: “A significant proportion of the Department for Foreign Affairs expenditure is in respect of overseas missions, most of which are small. Given the potential for developing synergies between DFA and agencies such as Enterprise Ireland, Tourism Ireland and An Bord Bia as well as the potential establishment of a European External Action Service in the event of the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, the Group recommends that the network of embassies and consulates be reduced from 76 to 55. The Group also recommends that Ambassador posts routinely be graded at Principal Officer level, with only the three or four largest missions graded at Assistant Secretary level as compared with the 41 ambassadors who are currently of Assistant Secretary grade or higher. The Group notes that the Foreign Service Allowance is not taxable nor is it subject to the pension levy or income levy and recommends that it be reduced by 12.5% in recognition of the contributions made by those serving in other areas of the public service.” There was no opposition evident to this proposal and therefore it is likely to go ahead. This effectively is the winding up of an Irish Foreign Service and the abandonment of a foreign policy. Instead we will have European External Action Service which is undefined but clearly saying that Foreign Policy is being handed over to the EU. There would be nothing wrong in this if the EU had a creditable foreign policy. But there is no area in the world where the EU is showing any spark of a policy that differs from the US-UK policy. Do we need to detail where that policy is going? It is a little remarked fact that all the major members of the EU and the vast majority of its members are ex-Imperial powers. Ireland is the most notable exception. These Imperial powers had to draw in their horns as a result of national liberation movements in the last century and were replaced on the world stage by the two Cold War powers who agreed on little but did agree that European Imperialist powers had had their day. But that situation is gone and the European powers have had another innings. The major member states have so arranged the new architecture of the EU that they and not the Commission have control of foreign policy. They have not just left the Commission out of it; they have imposed their own High Representative on the Commission, Solana - pacifist cum NATO warmonger. (Solana opposed NATO bases in Spain, and later was Secretary General of NATO 1995-1999). The new Presidency role will concentrate on Foreign policy and dominate all other EU institutions and, with Blair seriously considered for this role, there is little doubt about what it will become; and if he has first go at it he will shape the template for its future role. The intergovernmental methodology now applies rather than the community methodology. This means the major member states have a free hand and they do what comes naturally and the most natural thing in the world for them is a modernised version of moralising and dictating to the rest of the world. It’s back to the future for them. Never was an Irish foreign policy more badly needed just as it is being abolished! Contents: Editorial I:The end of an Irish Foreign Policy? p. 2 Editorial II: Danzig and the Start of the Second World War p. 9 Lisbon explained: John Temple Lang & Eamonn Gallagher p. 2 The launching of the Second World War: Brendan Clifford p. 11 World War II - A Foreign Affair: Pat Walsh p. 16 Haughey and German Unification; Letter Philip O'Connor p. 19 Nuclear weapons: Same double standards from Obama: David Morrison p. 20 The elephant in the room: Israel’s nuclear weapons: David Morrison p. 22 Documents: The role of the Soviet Union (and Poland) in the events leading to the Second World War: Kovaliov Sergei Nikolayevich p. 27 United Nations Deliberations on the Question of Palestine, 1947 p. 33 Blair Interview in Stern Magazine pp. 8, 26, 31 |